The U.S. Army announced a $1.2 billion contract with Lockheed Martin on Sept. 21 for the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) Increment 2, moving the system from development into production and doubling the service’s capacity to strike moving targets, according to a company statement reported by Military.com.
The contract, announced as part of broader plans to replace the aging Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), enables the PrSM to engage moving land and maritime targets, expanding the Army’s long-range strike options, Lockheed Martin said in a statement.
Hal Kempfer, a retired Marine intelligence officer and global defense expert, told Military.com the system is a “future game changer.” He noted that two PrSMs can be fired from a HighMar, or four from an M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System. “So, right off the bat, you get to keep using legacy launchers with more missile power and tremendous range. It about doubles the range,” Kempfer said.
Kempfer also highlighted survivability benefits: “You can reach out and touch a target from a lot further out. The farther you get away from the front lines, the less likely you are to encounter battery fire. So if you can put that thing back, 50 miles or 100 miles, you’re a lot safer. Your chances of getting your system taken out by air or something else drops dramatically. It’s a more survivable system.”
While the billion-dollar cost may seem high, Kempfer argued it will save the Army money in the long run: “Yes, the cost is a little more expensive, but you can put two of these things out there on a battlefield, as opposed to one. So, in that regard, you more than double your money. And in terms of firepower, you get a lot more. You get a lot more utility out of your HIMARS system. So, that’s where the savings are.”
Dave Griser, Lockheed Martin’s vice president for Precision Fires Launchers and Missile, called the deal “an important step” in facilitating the technology and putting it in the hands of warfighters.
Kempfer linked the contract to U.S. operations in the Indo-Pacific, where ground forces might engage enemy ships at sea while defending against air strikes at extended distances. He cited the South China Sea as an example of an “area denial strategy” involving U.S. use of islands as fire support bases. “In that regard, what you want is a system that’s going to meet your requirements there. PrSM does that. The ATACMS really don’t,” Kempfer said. “The ATACMS are great against stationary targets, not great at moving targets.”
Separately, the Army announced Tuesday that five companies—Anduril, Castelion, Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, Mach Industries, and RTX—were awarded through five Other Transaction Authority agreements to develop and deliver their pitches for the PrSM Increment 4 program, which targets long-range maritime moving targets. Prototypes are expected within Fiscal Year 2027, with follow-on contracts possible by FY28, according to USNI News.
Sources: DVIDS News · USNI News