News

News

Army grounds AH-64E fleet for second time in three months over transmission concerns
U.S. Army AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter on Flight Line Photo: Keith Garner

Army grounds AH-64E fleet for second time in three months over transmission concerns

The Army has grounded more than half of its AH-64E Apache attack helicopter fleet for the second time in three months over renewed concerns about a new transmission system, an Army official told Task & Purpose on Oct. 5, 2026.

The service announced Friday an “immediate, temporary pause in flight operations” for AH-64E Apaches equipped with Improved Drive System transmissions. An Army official said about 400 helicopters will be kept out of the air, affecting attack aviation units across the Army. The fleet numbered around 700 in 2023, according to a Congressional Budget Office report.

The pause follows an August grounding that lasted just over a week after two AH-64E pilots died in an accident outside Fort Hood, Texas. It is unclear how long the current stand-down will last, but an Army official said it could take months. Officials said the pause will continue while the fleet is inspected and “corrective actions” are carried out.

“This action follows ongoing Army technical and airworthiness assessments of the Improved Drive System transmission, including information developed through prior Safety of Flight actions, inspection results, maintenance reporting, and ongoing engineering analysis,” officials said in a release.

Since last October, at least four AH-64Es have experienced Class-A mishaps, the Army’s highest accident severity level, which includes any accident resulting in loss of life or permanent disability, or causing at least $2.5 million in damages, according to the September 2026 edition of FlightFax, the Army’s aviation safety magazine. By contrast, all other Army helicopters experienced a total of three Class-A mishaps in the same period.

The causes of the four major mishaps have not been made public, but the safety magazine noted that one included a “catastrophic transmission failure.”

Defense One reported that an internal Army investigation indicated that “some” Apaches with the improved drive system transmissions had problems with the new system.

Sources: DVIDS News · DVIDS News

News

U.S. Navy Successfully Test-Flies Blackbeard Hypersonic Strike Missile from Super Hornet
F-18F after launch from USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72).jpg Photo: U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class James R. Evans

U.S. Navy Successfully Test-Flies Blackbeard Hypersonic Strike Missile from Super Hornet

The U.S. Navy completed a successful test flight of the Blackbeard long-range hypersonic strike missile from a Super Hornet, marking a significant milestone for a major Navy offensive capability.

The Blackbeard missile, designed for long-range strikes, was launched from a Super Hornet aircraft, demonstrating the integration of the weapon with the Navy’s carrier-based fighter fleet. The successful test validates the missile’s performance and brings it closer to operational use.

The Navy has not disclosed specific performance details, such as range or speed, but the successful flight is a key step in the development of the hypersonic weapon, which is intended to provide the Navy with a rapid-strike capability against high-value targets.

The test flight is part of the Navy’s broader effort to field hypersonic weapons, which travel at speeds exceeding Mach 5 and are designed to evade enemy defenses.

The successful test comes as the Navy continues to modernize its offensive capabilities, focusing on hypersonic technology to counter emerging threats.

The Navy has not announced a timeline for the Blackbeard missile’s operational deployment, but the successful test flight is a critical step forward in bringing the weapon to the fleet.

Sources: DVIDS News · DVIDS News

News

Boeing lands potential $14.7B PAC-3 seeker contract from Lockheed Martin
Strong Teams: 31st ADA Brigade Air Defenders Conduct Patriot Reload Drills Photo: CPT Madison Fuentes

Boeing lands potential $14.7B PAC-3 seeker contract from Lockheed Martin

Boeing has been awarded an undefinitized contract worth up to $14.7 billion to increase production of seekers for the PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement (MSE) interceptor, the company announced Oct. 5. The seven-year deal was issued by Lockheed Martin, which manufactures the PAC-3, and follows a framework agreement Boeing reached with the Pentagon in April to triple seeker production.

The PAC-3 MSE is a hit-to-kill interceptor launched by the Patriot air defense system to defeat threats such as missiles and aircraft, according to Breaking Defense. A seeker is mounted in a missile’s nose and helps guide it to its target.

“Early investment and a relentless focus on quality and execution have positioned us to now deliver seekers at unprecedented levels in the near-term, and we’re committed to building on that momentum,” Steve Parker, president and CEO of Boeing’s defense unit, said in a company release.

The award is an undefinitized contract action, or UCA, which allows work to begin while final dollar amounts and quantities are finalized. Breaking Defense reported that the UCA structure permits early work even when appropriations are stalled, noting that a fiscal 2027 budget has not yet been approved by lawmakers.

Boeing said it began ramping up production and surging hiring earlier this year at its facilities in Huntsville, Alabama, to support increased output. Historically, the missile’s seeker has reportedly been a choke point for PAC-3 production.

The seeker contract follows a nearly $59 billion contract vehicle for PAC-3 MSE production issued to Lockheed in July, which came after a framework agreement to raise the missile’s output to 2,000 units annually by 2030.

In August, Boeing revealed it is developing a low-cost alternative seeker called the Ultra Low-Cost Seeker amid military demand for cheaper interceptor options. Boeing said future flight tests are planned but has not disclosed when the new seeker could enter service.

Sources: USNI News · Defence Blog

News

US Pulls All B-1 Bombers From RAF Fairford After Suspected Terror Plot
B-52 Stratofortresses return from Bomber Task Force operations (8890685).jpg Photo: U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Luis Gomez

US Pulls All B-1 Bombers From RAF Fairford After Suspected Terror Plot

The U.S. Air Force has removed all B-1 bombers from RAF Fairford in England, a Pentagon official confirmed on Sunday, one week after several men were arrested there on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts. The dozen B-1 bombers stationed at the base, located northwest of London, have re-deployed to their home stations in the United States.

“While operational security precluded us from confirming the movement of our assets and forces in real-time, we can acknowledge now that all US bombers that were deployed to RAF Fairford have re-deployed to their home stations in the United States,” a Pentagon spokesman wrote in an email.

The aircraft had been used for U.S. strikes on Iranian missile sites attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz, a mission the British government had allowed from the base.

Arrests and Allegations

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham said Wednesday that Britain has “strong indications” that Iran was involved in a suspected plot targeting the base. U.S. President Donald Trump said those involved had planned “big damage,” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio pointed to the “hands of a foreign actor.” Iran called the accusations baseless and summoned the British ambassador in Tehran over the issue.

The Wall Street Journal first reported the aircraft were removed amid security concerns over suspected terror plots against the facility.

Sources: Air & Space Forces Magazine · Defense News

News

Pentagon Review of Limited Nuclear Options to Skip Public Report
A U.S Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber takes flight (28080317364).jpg Photo: US Air Force from USA Airman 1st Class Alexa Ann Henderson

Pentagon Review of Limited Nuclear Options to Skip Public Report

The Pentagon is conducting a classified review of limited nuclear war options, a process that will not produce the public report that accompanied the last three formal Nuclear Posture Reviews, according to a Military.com report published Oct. 5, 2026. The review is being led by Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby, who has described the goal as developing “rationally employable, limited options” to manage escalation. The effort is separate from the formal Nuclear Posture Reviews released in 2010, 2018, and 2022, which publicly detailed U.S. nuclear doctrine and force structure.

Colby told the Senate Armed Services Committee in March that the Pentagon did not plan to conduct a formal Nuclear Posture Review, considering the declaratory policy in the 2018 document sufficient. The current, narrower review is not expected to be released publicly. While the 1994 and 2001 reviews were also largely classified, the 2010 review was the first released publicly, establishing a transparency practice continued under subsequent administrations.

The review reportedly places greater emphasis on limited nuclear options for regional conflicts. One potential change would reduce the emphasis on “damage limitation,” which seeks to reduce damage from an adversary’s nuclear attack. The review builds on the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review, which called for the lower-yield W76-2 submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead, first deployed in late 2019 and publicly confirmed in February 2020.

Congress is considering weapons to support this strategy. The Senate Armed Services Committee’s Fiscal Year 2027 defense policy proposal recommended new surface-launched and air-launched nuclear weapons, despite no funding request from the Pentagon or Energy Department. The Navy is also acquiring a nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM-N). Congress requires a limited number to be available for combatant command requirements by September 2032 and initial operational capability by 2034. The Pentagon and National Nuclear Security Administration expect to spend $14.4 billion on the program over five years, as covered by the 2027 budget request.

Under 10 U.S.C. Section 491, the president must give Congress a report at least 60 days before implementing changes to nuclear employment strategy, but the statute requires neither congressional approval nor public release. The New START treaty expired Feb. 5, leaving the United States and Russia without legally binding limits on deployed strategic arsenals for the first time in more than half a century.

Context

Supporters of the W76-2 have argued that more limited nuclear response options could deter an adversary that doubts Washington would answer a lower-yield attack with a much larger strike. The president retains sole authority to authorize nuclear use, and any order must comply with the law of armed conflict, which governs use based on distinction, military necessity, and proportionality.

Sources: USNI News · DefenseScoop

News

Internal reports say Canadian troops were ill-prepared for Arctic warfare in Alaska exercise
10th Mountain, 11th Airborne Division, Canadian Soldiers Train on Finnish Snow Machines Photo: SGT Salvador Castro

Internal reports say Canadian troops were ill-prepared for Arctic warfare in Alaska exercise

Internal Department of National Defence documents show Canadian troops were ill-prepared and occasionally ill-equipped for Arctic conditions during a major training exercise with U.S. forces in Alaska last winter, according to reports obtained by CBC News.

The exercise, called Global Response, took place in February at the Joint Pacific Multinational Readiness Center north of Fairbanks, Alaska. It involved more than 400 members of the 3rd Battalion Royal Canadian Regiment (3RCR), which was folded into a larger U.S. Army brigade. Temperatures plunged below –30 C.

Separate Canadian and American evaluations both listed concerns about troops’ readiness and equipment for harsh conditions.

“Throughout their stay in the waiting area the Coy [Company] consistently demonstrated a lack of preparations needed to live in Arctic conditions,” said an undated Canadian evaluation that assessed individual companies within the battalion.

The report criticized a recent initiative allowing the regiment to buy off-the-shelf civilian equipment to supplement military cold-weather gear. “This was evident when observing soldiers attempting to remedy issues with a Coleman stove and lanterns or watching them attempt to set up a 10-man tent,” the evaluation said. It noted a “lack of emphasis on basic winter soldiering skills” among some Canadian units.

Lt.-Col. Aaron Corey, commander of 3RCR, disagreed with the assessment. He said his troops trained for winter conditions for a year before the Alaska deployment.

“Every soldier to go up on that exercise had to be a cold weather operator qualified,” Corey said. “All of our leaders from the sections and up, we received cold weather leader training and then we had Arctic operations advisers that were sprinkled into the battalion as well.”

As many as 30 troops suffered various levels of frostbite during the exercise, though the battalion still captured its training objectives, the reports said.

Corey said troops learned they must slow down and account for weather more than in other operations. “We had the enemy and the weather, which was a greater enemy in most cases,” he said.

Other findings in the documents included gaps in the medical team’s understanding of its tasks. An undated evaluation prepared for the health services branch said medics thought they were only on standby for real casualties, not the training scenario. On three occasions, some were seen using personal phones for long calls, giving away their positions. The medical team received only a four-hour professional development seminar on Arctic medicine instead of a five-day U.S.-led course at the Arctic medicine simulation centre.

Chief Warrant Officer Robert McSpadden, regimental sergeant major for 3RCR, said he found the medical team outstanding, especially in treating frostbite casualties, and could not speak to training decisions.

The reports also noted rapid cold weather drained drone batteries, leaving in some cases only 10 minutes of flying time, and communications problems due to the absence of satellites so far north. The American assessment, prepared by the Ted Stevens Center for Arctic Security Studies, noted U.S. units had similar difficulties, including a lack of snowclearing equipment and a shortage of fuel to keep engines running.

Retired colonel Pierre Leblanc, who commanded in the Far North in the late 1990s, said it has been almost a generation since Canadian troops were present in large numbers in the Arctic and many skills will have to be relearned. “It’s a different world,” he said.

Sources: CBC Politics

News

US pulls all bombers from RAF Fairford a week after terror arrests
2nd Bomb Wing conducts Bomber Task Force 26-3 Photo: TSgt Victoria Boyton

US pulls all bombers from RAF Fairford a week after terror arrests

The U.S. Air Force has pulled all bombers from RAF Fairford in England, sending them back to the United States a week after six people were arrested on suspicion of plotting terrorist acts near the base, defense officials confirmed.

A Pentagon official said on Sunday that a dozen B-1 bombers had been stationed at the base, located northwest of London, and had been used for U.S. strikes on Iran. A defense official confirmed to Task & Purpose that B-1s, B-2s and B-52s have all left the base.

“While operational security precluded us from confirming the movement of our assets and forces in real-time, we can acknowledge now that all U.S. bombers that were deployed to RAF Fairford have re-deployed to their home stations in the United States,” a Pentagon spokesman said in a statement.

“The airmen that operate America’s bomber force, including B-1s, B-2s, and B-52s, remain ready to deliver precision global strike capabilities — including through operations that launch and recover from the continental United States — anywhere, anytime,” the statement continued.

The Wall Street Journal first reported on the bombers’ movement. The official did not give a specific reason for the move.

Five people were arrested in the early hours of Sept. 27 after three vans were seen driving toward the base. British authorities set up a large security cordon around the base and a nearby village, with explosive ordnance teams brought in. A sixth individual, a 25-year-old British-Iranian dual national, was arrested Thursday in London on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts. All six have been released on bail.

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham said there were “strong indications” that Iran was involved in the suspected plot, which Tehran has denied. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the incident “involves the hands of a foreign actor.” President Donald Trump said those involved had planned “big damage.”

RAF Fairford, in Gloucestershire, has been heavily used by the Air Force in support of operations against Iran. B-52 Stratofortress and B-1B Lancer bombers staged at the base before heading to the Middle East on missions. British counterterrorism police are continuing to investigate the incident.

Sources: Military.com · Task & Purpose

News

Army, Navy Announce Over $1.2 Billion in Missile and Drone Acquisitions
Army and Navy Continue Tests of Hypersonic Missile Photo: Darrell Ames

Army, Navy Announce Over $1.2 Billion in Missile and Drone Acquisitions

The Army and Navy announced over $1.2 billion in new missile and drone acquisitions, including Blackbeard hypersonic missiles and the next-generation Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) Increment 2, according to a Military.com report published Oct. 5, 2026.

The Navy made a production delivery order in mid-September to deliver $200 million worth of Blackbeard hypersonic missiles. The Army signed a contract worth up to $1.2 billion with Lockheed Martin to push PrSM Increment 2 into production.

The announcements follow a developmental test flight on Sept. 18, during which a pair of Blackbeard hypersonic missiles were mounted on a Super Hornet. The test was another step in the program’s progression to Early Operational Capability (EOC), according to the report.

In a separate development, the 94th Army Air and Missile Defense Command hosted the Pacific Simulation for Integrated Air and Missile Defense Modernization (PACSIM) event at the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Flight Center from Sept. 21-26, 2026. The event brought together air and missile defense professionals from the U.S., Japanese, and Australian militaries to examine defense concepts, identify challenges, and explore ways to improve integration between the three nations.

Using constructive simulation data provided by Raytheon Aerospace and Defense Company and the 94th AAMDC, participants worked through sandbox scenarios to improve understanding of modernized integrated air and missile defense (IAMD) capabilities and inform future planning.

“This year’s PACSIM event invited a trilateral audience to better understand modernized Army IAMD capabilities through the use of a simulation tool,” said Maj. Hazumu Yano, the PACSIM event facilitator assigned to the 94th AAMDC. “As the United States fields new systems, it will be important for our allies in the Pacific to know how we intend to employ these capabilities.”

Brig. Gen. William Parker, the 94th AAMDC commanding general, addressed participants during PACSIM and highlighted the importance of advancing air and missile defense capabilities while preparing Soldiers to employ them.

“At the end of the day, we may fight with technology, but people win the fight,” said Parker. “What we choose to do with that technology will determine what that outcome looks like.”

Sources: DVIDS News · DVIDS News

News

USS Ronald Reagan Becomes Second Carrier Equipped to Operate MQ-25A Stingray Drone Tanker
US Navy 080909-N-7571S-033 Flight deck personnel aboard the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) observe flight operations.jpg Photo: U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Nathan Laird

USS Ronald Reagan Becomes Second Carrier Equipped to Operate MQ-25A Stingray Drone Tanker

The aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) has become the second U.S. Navy carrier equipped to operate the MQ-25A Stingray, the service’s carrier-based drone tanker, after crews completed installation of an Unmanned Air Warfare Center aboard the ship in August, according to Defence Blog.

The center is the shipboard control room for the MQ-25A and houses the MD-5C ground control station that operators use to command the drone. The Unmanned Carrier Aviation Program Office, known as PMA-268, manages the effort.

USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) received the first operational installation in March. On USS Ronald Reagan, the Navy completed all 11 ship modifications at once within a single 17-month period, rather than spreading the work over several years in phases. That window matched the carrier’s recent overhaul: USS Ronald Reagan spent 17 months in a scheduled dry-dock maintenance period at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Bremerton, Washington, starting in March 2025, and left for sea trials on Sept. 3.

“With each new install and milestone, we are closing the gap for our warfighters to give them the capability, capacity, and lethality they need to win the fight,” said Capt. Daniel Fucito, PMA-268 program manager.

The control station combines the Navy’s command, control, communications, computers and intelligence network, Lockheed Martin’s MDCX software and hardware for planning and running missions, and other government-built equipment. The Navy has built shore, at-sea and expeditionary versions of the MD-5 so the MQ-25A can be flown from almost anywhere.

Next, the ship’s crew and the program team will run pier-side and at-sea tests to confirm the system is ready to support the drone.

The MQ-25A, built by Boeing, is meant to take over aerial refueling duties now handled by F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, freeing those fighters for combat missions and extending the range of the carrier air wing. It is the Navy’s first operational unmanned aircraft designed to fly from a carrier deck.

The program has faced long delays. A test aircraft first flew in 2019, but the first production-representative MQ-25A did not fly until April 25 this year, at Boeing’s facility at MidAmerica Airport in Illinois. In May, the Pentagon approved the program for low-rate initial production. The Navy plans to buy 76 aircraft in total.

The drone is expected to move to Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland, later this year to prepare for carrier qualification testing. Earlier plans called for the first MQ-25A to deploy aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt in 2026, but production problems and carrier availability pushed that back. The Navy defines initial operational capability as three MQ-25As with trained crews ready to deploy on a capable carrier, and a Pentagon report in April estimated that milestone could slip to 2029.

Sources: Stars and Stripes · USNI News

News

Army’s M1E3 Abrams and XM30 Prototypes Seen Firing Live Rounds
1st Cavalry Soldiers Fire M1 Abrams Tanks During Live-Fire Training Photo: SPC Nathan Starr

Army’s M1E3 Abrams and XM30 Prototypes Seen Firing Live Rounds

New footage shows the U.S. Army’s next-generation M1E3 Abrams tank and two XM30 infantry fighting vehicle prototypes firing live rounds, offering one of the first public looks at the vehicles in action. The footage was shared on LinkedIn by Alexander Miller, chief technology officer to the U.S. Army chief of staff, who said he went hands-on with the M1E3 pre-prototype, one of the XM30 offerings, the Mobile Tactical Cannon and new optics, and watched robots from the Army’s Operation Jailbreak Falcon Fury shoot down drones. He did not say where the event took place or name the units involved.

M1E3 Abrams

The M1E3 is the Army’s redesign of its main battle tank, launched in 2023 after the service cancelled a planned SEPv4 upgrade to the current Abrams. The first early prototype was unveiled at the Detroit Auto Show in January. It has an uncrewed turret with an autoloader, a three-person crew seated in the hull, digital controls and an open systems architecture meant to allow quick hardware and software updates. Four pre-prototypes built by Roush are due to reach the 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, known as the Iron Horse brigade, at Fort Hood, Texas, later this year, with General Dynamics Land Systems delivering more.

XM30 Competition

The XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle competition pits General Dynamics Land Systems’ Wolf against American Rheinmetall’s Lynx-based design. Both companies delivered their first prototypes at the end of August and the start of September, and each is building eight. The two designs are headed to the same Iron Horse brigade for soldier testing, including a National Training Center rotation in spring 2027, and the Army could pick a winner after that.

Other Programs

The Mobile Tactical Cannon is the Army’s program to replace the towed M777 howitzer with a wheeled, self-propelled 155 mm gun that can fire and move quickly. In August, the service picked Hanwha Defense USA’s K9 Mobile Howitzer, ordering six prototypes with an option for 12 more.

Miller used the post to argue that cheap, numerous systems still matter alongside expensive ones.

“Mass still matters. Pretending that it doesn’t is risk blindness and academics. To take and hold land you need mass – affordable mass, with autonomy, mission planning at superhuman scale and speed, and execution at echelon,” said Alexander Miller.

“We should always make the first engagement with any adversary a trade for blood and steel. Their blood, our steel,” Miller said.

He also pointed to the networks behind the vehicles. Miller said the Next Generation Command and Control program provides the data platform for tools and applications, while the Integrated Battle Command System-Maneuver handles fire control and asset management for counter-drone sensors and weapons. Cheap, attritable drones flow to units from the Defense Innovation Unit’s Drone Dominance Program through a drone marketplace, he wrote.

Power is a growing problem for troops in the field, Miller added.

“Soldiers draw between 60-120W depending on their loadout. That’s nearly continuous. When you get to a squad you’re at almost a kW of draw – that’s before drone batteries,” Miller said.

He said mobile power that does not give away troops through visual, acoustic or infrared signatures is critical. Operation Jailbreak is the Army’s push to make sensors, weapons and software from different companies work together, starting with counter-drone and air defense systems. Miller did not say which robots took part or what weapons they used against the drones.

The Army has not said when M1E3 testing with the Iron Horse brigade will begin or released results from the live-fire event.

Sources: DVIDS News · DVIDS News